Forum Replies Created
- Replies
-
- November 5, 2026 at 3:33 pm
- in reply to: FXIFY – Discussion/Q&A
A 25% price cut paired with a free bump to a 90% profit split makes it a lot easier to pull the trigger on a challenge, especially since you don’t have to pay extra for the top-tier payout tier.00- November 3, 2026 at 3:06 pm
- in reply to: Funded7 – Discussion/Q&A
Keeping that 25% discount running into November is smart for anyone who missed the Halloween rush, especially if you want a calmer two-phase structure to test out your edge without eating a massive fee.00- October 29, 2026 at 4:04 pm
- in reply to: The5%ers – Discussion/Q&A
Seeing public payout leaderboards is always a great way to gauge a firm’s transparency, even if the top spots usually belong to heavy-hitting swing traders who manage risk like an institution.00- October 28, 2026 at 12:03 pm
- in reply to: Funding Pips – Discussion/Q&A
After all that drama over forced migrations into PRIME accounts, turning it into a closed chapter for new sign-ups feels like they’re finally trying to clean the slate and dial back the community friction.00- October 23, 2026 at 11:33 am
- in reply to: VanquishTrader – Discussion/Q&A
A rapid elite model sounds fast-paced, but you always have to check if the tighter daily loss limits offset the speed of getting funded.00- October 20, 2026 at 12:02 pm
- in reply to: Bullwaves Prime – Discussion/Q&A
Paid add-ons are fine and all, but turning a standard challenge into a custom build just means you’re paying extra fees upfront for rules that should probably just be standard anyway.00- October 19, 2026 at 12:59 pm
- in reply to: Crypto Fund Trader – Discussion/Q&A
22 million in total payouts is a massive milestone for any firm, though it makes you wonder how much of that volume came from crypto-backed accounts versus standard forex challengers.00- October 13, 2026 at 12:06 pm
- in reply to: Wall Street Funded – Discussion/Q&A
60% off a challenge is nature’s way of telling me I can afford to blow two accounts this week instead of one.00- October 12, 2026 at 1:09 pm
- in reply to: Fintokei – Discussion/Q&A
Awesome interview, love that he admitted losing money searching for the entry first instead of pretending every trade was a perfect zero-drawdown execution.00- October 6, 2026 at 1:05 pm
- in reply to: iFunds – Discussion/Q&A
No evaluation, no daily drawdown limits, and now no waiting period for payouts? This is how instant funding is supposed to work.00- September 30, 2026 at 2:05 pm
- in reply to: FundedNext – Discussion/Q&A
Impressive numbers on paper, but how many of these payouts actually went through seamlessly without getting held up in compliance audits for ‘news trading’ or ‘arbitrage’ violations?00- September 25, 2026 at 12:07 pm
- in reply to: FXIFY – Discussion/Q&A
Honestly, seeing $13k in confirmed payouts is nice, but I’m more interested in whether people are using their 3-Phase or Instant Funding setups to get there.00- September 23, 2026 at 12:05 pm
- in reply to: Moneta Funded – Discussion/Q&A
Good to see payouts going through, especially with their static drawdown structure on the 2-step challenges.00- September 18, 2026 at 1:09 pm
- in reply to: FunderPro – Discussion/Q&A
Are news trading and weekend position holds allowed by default on these flexible plans, or do you have to buy a specific swing add-on at checkout to avoid getting flagged during major red-folder events?00- September 16, 2026 at 11:06 am
- in reply to: Hola Prime – Discussion/Q&A
Good update for manual swing traders who don’t want a rigid clock dictating when their risk parameters have to be submitted to the broker backend.00